Miro

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

Share prototypes with stakeholders and clients to quickly obtain useful input on new concepts we are developing. We came to understand the need of receiving design feedback swiftly so that we could make modifications and begin development as soon as feasible. Before putting their products on the market, my clients were able to validate their product ideas and enhance their UX thanks to InVision. In essence, it removed the element of risk from product selection.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

It was simple to add components to online surveys because to InVision straightforward emulation of actual apps and straightforward linkages to prototypes. The capability of design prototyping appeals to me. At my firm, we frequently use this application to create prototypes, share them with different stakeholders, get their input, and respond to their inquiries in real time on the prototype. Because Invision is so user-friendly, any department can rapidly understand a new design and provide input. I appreciate that the prototypes are clickable, much like a real product would be.

What do you dislike most about this product?

I can't really think of anything I don't like about it, though perhaps if I was more engaged in prototyping I might. However, I just use Invision in my present position to review design prototypes and offer input; for this use case, it works well.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Although InVision is a highly complete prototype tool, you need also take alternative options like Axure into consideration to make sure they match your demands. I advise you to utilize this tool for all design prototypes and to send the prototypes to potential customers and interested parties for feedback.

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

We've fixed the problem of not being able to demo some integrations. We can all use inVision to demonstrate how our system interacts with other systems in a consistent manner. Invision has been a great tool for our company because it has virtues in its programming that help us in a variety of ways, such as being able to create designs that can be clicked on to quickly visualize the user experience, because this software has helped us create beautiful and referential interfaces with a unique elaboration, primarily for our operators who use the company's platform.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

I appreciate Invision because it is a design-to-develop platform with a lot of useful tools and capabilities for working in bulk, such as enabling for reasonably smooth communication within a team based on mobile prototype. or online, because it is cutting-edge high-tech software, i.e. very inventive in terms of performance on any platform. We had various goods and integrations that we couldn't test before. We can all present various integrations to our clients using inVision, which helps us all stay aligned by exhibiting the same thing. I also enjoy how current it appears.

What do you dislike most about this product?

The Invision web application is very heavyweight and therefore very slow. This is a problem as work within the platform tends to lag and performance is very poor, similar to mobile applications. A quick and easy experience. Other highlights can emphasize that navigating the various themes can be difficult and confusing.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

This program is ideal if a small design team is obtained; in other aspects, it should be mentioned that it is incredibly beneficial when illustrating the flows and how the user interacts with any of the produced interfaces, as well as the fact that it can be developed rapidly. InVision is an excellent tool for generating a walkthrough demo. There are likely additional applications for the platform, but that is how we utilize it at Bullhorn. I would recommend this application to people who are exhibiting software or a service online but do not have all of the skills to display every aspect.

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

Project progress and time spent on tasks are two of the many things we utilize it for on a regular basis. In the beginning, we used it as a tool for managing tasks because that was a simple approach to get people using it. We are gradually integrating more complex procedures and more aspects of our job into the system in order to make full use of the tool's capabilities. Transparency within teams and effective management of work processes are two of our top priorities.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

My coworkers find it challenging, so I do realize that my impression of how simple it is is dependent on my own personal experience. I think it's great for monitoring the progress of major projects and keeping tabs on who's approved what. This has helped tremendously with the approval process, which we use in our contracting with management and the Operations teams.

What do you dislike most about this product?

The learning curve is quite steep. When utilizing a third-party-created Wrike system, this slope may be significantly steeper. This is a relatively minor issue because of Wrike's remarkable adaptability. Each topic in the program can be learned in as little as 15 minutes with the help of their specially made video lessons. Some of them are even hilarious.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Ideally suited to a context such as ours, where the scale of projects varies widely. There is a need for quick turnaround times when designing GIFs or emails, but we also have to construct product packaging and guidelines for the entire manufacturing product lifecycle.