- GIS investments are often driven bottom-up by platform, data, or departmental requests rather than by the business decisions and workflows that require spatial context.
- Mining and oil and gas use cases span subsurface, surface, asset network, field, and real-time contexts, making it difficult to distinguish foundational needs from specialized capabilities.
- Technical gaps and external dependencies are rarely traced back to priority use cases, weakening investment rationale and implementation sequencing.
- Organizations struggle to translate capability gaps into solution-neutral requirements and executable initiatives.
Our Advice
Critical Insight
- A GIS strategy should start with decisions, not technology: Identify where location, terrain, subsurface conditions, proximity, or movement materially affects outcomes, then work backward to the enabling capabilities.
- GIS does not need to own every system or model; value comes from integrating authoritative information and inserting spatial decision support at the right point in the workflow.
- Capabilities create direction, but requirements and initiatives create action. Traceability from use case to gap to requirement keeps the roadmap business-aligned.
Impact and Result
- Prioritize GIS-supported decisions based on business value and define a clear contribution for GIS within each workflow.
- Establish the technical capabilities, dependencies, readiness gaps, and solution-neutral requirements needed to support selected use cases.
- Group requirements into independently executable initiatives and sequence them on an implementation roadmap.